www.law.suffolk.edu/highlights/stuorgs/lawreview/XLIII2010_3

Search:

» Home » Current Students » Student Organizations » Honor Boards » Law Review

VOLUME XLIII 2010 NUMBER 3

FORGOTTEN TRUST: A CHECK-THE-BOX ACHILLES' HEEL		Carter G. Bishop
BEWARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BEARING GIFTS: HOW THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 COULD BECOME A WHISTLEBLOWING TROJAN HORSE		Ian D. Prior & Lisa Skehill
	SYMPOSIUM: CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN CHINA

FOREWORD: SYMPOSIUM ON CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN CHINA		Miguel Schor
A CONSTITUTIONAL COURT FOR CHINA WITHIN THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY: SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT AND A RECONSIDERATION OF THE INSTITUTIONAL ROLE OF THE CCP		Larry Catá Backer
CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN CHINA: AN UNACCOMPLISHED PROJECT OR A MIRAGE?		Guobin Zhu
NULLA POENA SINE LEGE IN CHINA: RIGIDITY OR FLEXIBILITY?		Li Li
A COMMENT ON THE RISE AND FALL OF THE SUPREME PEOPLE'S COURT'S REPLY TO QU YULING'S CASE		Zhiwei Tong
THE COMMUNIST PARTY AND THE LAW: AN OUTLINE OF FORMAL AND LESS FORMAL LINKAGES BETWEEN THE RULING PARTY AND OTHER LEGAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA		Manuél E. Delmestro

NOTES

CEO, CFO, COO . . . Cube Dweller? Attorney-Client Privilege and Corporate Communication: Whose Communications Should Massachusetts Law Protect?

As Montville, Maine Goes, So Goes Wolcott, Vermont? A Primer on the Local Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops

COMMENTS

Constitutional Law-Ninth Circuit Upholds Constitutionality of Felon-in-Possession of Body Armor Statute with De Minimus Jurisdictional Element-United States v. Alderman, 565 F.3d 641 (9th Cir. 2009), reh'g en banc denied, 593 F.3d 1141 (9th Cir. 2010)

Criminal Procedure-First Circuit Establishes Less Demanding Requirement of Particularized Need to Access Prior Grand Jury Testimony-In re Grand Jury, 566 F.3d 12(1st Cir. 2009)

Criminal Procedure-Government May Not Introduce Evidence Derived from Illegal Private Wiretaps Despite Its "Clean Hands"-United States v. Crabtree, 565 F.3d 887 (4th Cir. 2009)

Criminal Procedure-Supreme Judicial Court Delineates Method for Application of Forfeiture to Indigent Criminal Defendant-Commonwealth v. Means, 907 N.E.2d 646 (Mass. 2009)

Federal Criminal Procedure-Local District Court Rule Does Not Provide Judge Authority to Order "Narrowcast" of Motion Hearing-In re Sony BMG Music Entertainment, 564 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2009)

Suffolk Univ. Law Review

-	Members
-	Previous Issues
-	Donahue Lecture Series
-	Article Submissions
-	Subscriptions
-	Closed Write-On

Transnational Law Review

Suffolk Journal of Trial & Appellate Advocacy

JHTL - Journal of High Technology Law

JHBL - Journal of Health & Biomedical Law

		HOME \| ABOUT SUFFOLK \| ACADEMIC PROGRAMS \| ADMISSIONS \| FACULTY \| OFFICES & SERVICES Suffolk University \| Campus Calendar \| Campus Cruiser Portal \| Law Library \| Directories \| Site Map \| Login \| Email \| Mission Statement \| Contact Us

		Copyright © Suffolk University Law School, 2003-2012. Disclaimer \|120 Tremont Street \| Boston \| MA \| 02108-4977